Understanding How Clothing Sizes Work – The Technical Breakdown

Understanding How Clothing Sizes Work — The Technical Breakdown

Clothing size systems can feel arbitrary and inconsistent — and that’s because, in many ways, they are. While most consumers expect clothing labels to reflect universal body measurements, the reality is that apparel sizing is shaped by a mix of historical conventions, brand-specific strategies, manufacturing limitations, and shifting market demands.

So how to find your correct size?

Use Tellar.co.uk, https://tellar.co.uk, it’s a free app and website which will match your body measurements to over 1500 clothes brands size charts, to give your perfect fit every time.

Let’s break it down technically:

1. There Is No Global Standard for Sizing

While some countries have published official sizing standards (e.g. EN 13402 in Europe, ISO 8559 internationally, ASTM D5585 in the U.S.), few brands follow them. Most fashion brands create proprietary sizing systems based on their fit models — individuals whose measurements represent the brand’s target demographic.

Even when brands reference standard size charts, they often modify them for branding or commercial reasons. This leads to significant size variance, even across products from the same company.

2. Grading Systems Define Size Increments

Apparel sizing is built on a process called grading — systematically increasing or decreasing the dimensions of a base pattern to create a full size range. For example, a standard women’s grading rule might increase bust, waist, and hip measurements by 2.5 cm between sizes.

However, grading isn’t uniform across all brands or even garment types:

Some brands grade based on proportional increases (e.g., waist increases by 2 cm, but hips by 3 cm).
Others apply linear or nonlinear grading depending on fabric stretch, design, or intended fit.

This explains why two size 10 garments from different brands — or even different collections — can have very different actual measurements.

3. Vanity Sizing Skews Numerical Integrity

Many brands engage in vanity sizing, where garment measurements are larger than what the labeled size would traditionally indicate. For instance, a size 8 dress today might have the same dimensions as a size 12 from 20 years ago.

This is done for psychological marketing: consumers are more likely to purchase clothing when the tag displays a smaller size than expected. Unfortunately, this practice further degrades the reliability of size labels as a consistent reference point.

4. Sizing Systems Vary Across Regions

International sizing systems differ significantly:

US sizing often uses even numbers (e.g., 2, 4, 6, 8) or lettered sizes (XS–XL).
UK sizing uses a similar numerical system but is generally two sizes higher than the US equivalent (UK 10 ≈ US 6).
EU sizing is based on body measurements in centimeters (e.g., EU 38 = bust approx. 88 cm).
Asian markets may use different metrics entirely, often running smaller due to regional anthropometric data.

Conversion charts exist but often oversimplify the complexity behind pattern grading, garment shape, and intended fit.

5. Fit and Style Are Critical Variables

Even when measurements match, fit intent alters the final garment feel:

A bodycon dress in size M will hug the form, while a relaxed-fit shirt in size M may hang loosely — despite similar bust and waist dimensions.
Knit fabrics (stretchy) are typically fitted closer to the body than wovens (non-stretch), often allowing for negative ease.
Brands may design differently for junior, misses, plus, or petite lines — all of which have distinct pattern blocks.

This is why actual body measurements, combined with knowledge of the brand’s fit philosophy, are far more reliable than a size tag alone.

6. The Role of Anthropometric Data

Some brands use 3D body scan data or anthropometric surveys (e.g., SizeUK, SizeUSA, CAESAR) to shape their size ranges. However, this data is often outdated or based on limited samples. As populations diversify in body shape and proportions, these models can quickly become unrepresentative.

Progressive brands now incorporate dynamic sizing tools and data analytics — including AI-powered fit prediction — to more accurately match consumers to garments.

Key Takeaways:

Clothing sizes are brand-specific and often driven by marketing or target demographics rather than technical consistency.
Actual garment measurements and intended fit style are more informative than size labels.
For accurate fit, use your own measurements (chest, waist, hips) and compare them to each store’s detailed size chart.
Technology like size recommendation engines or fit prediction algorithms is becoming increasingly essential in e-commerce to address the flaws in legacy sizing systems.